Comments on: Kevin Ham Sucks http://www.yourmyrant.com/2007/10/20/kevin-ham-sucks/ Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:33:24 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Janeth http://www.yourmyrant.com/2007/10/20/kevin-ham-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-8 Janeth Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:59:02 +0000 http://www.yourmyrant.com/2007/08/20/kevin-ham-sucks/#comment-8 I think a parasite on a leech is a good thing. It lets the leech learn how it feels. But the problem is that you I think a parasite on a leech is a good thing. It lets the leech learn how it feels. But the problem is that you

]]> By: Chris http://www.yourmyrant.com/2007/10/20/kevin-ham-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-7 Chris Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:15:38 +0000 http://www.yourmyrant.com/2007/08/20/kevin-ham-sucks/#comment-7 I was able to see the geeksonsteroids.com site without any problem. Did Kevin take that and put up a fake site? I'm confused... And I see someone has registered geeksonsteroids.net and put up a parking page. That doesn't seem to be registered to Kevin Ham from what I can see. I think he goes for more generic domains that can make him money, like god.com. I guess you could say he is leeeching off god with that one, since a lot of marketing has gone into that name, but I think the name was for sale and Kevin Ham bought it, so what's wrong with that? If god sells it's domain, then I think that's legal...? Kevin Ham may not have a clue about marketing, but I doubt that's true. All I know is I have some clues about marketing and I make almost nothing next to Kevin Ham. Since I have registered domains that contain his name, is that ok? Or am I just a parasite on a leech? And if I am, is that good or bad? I mean, if a leech is bad, then a parasite on that leech must be good, right? I was able to see the geeksonsteroids.com site without any problem. Did Kevin take that and put up a fake site? I’m confused…

And I see someone has registered geeksonsteroids.net and put up a parking page. That doesn’t seem to be registered to Kevin Ham from what I can see. I think he goes for more generic domains that can make him money, like god.com. I guess you could say he is leeeching off god with that one, since a lot of marketing has gone into that name, but I think the name was for sale and Kevin Ham bought it, so what’s wrong with that? If god sells it’s domain, then I think that’s legal…?

Kevin Ham may not have a clue about marketing, but I doubt that’s true. All I know is I have some clues about marketing and I make almost nothing next to Kevin Ham. Since I have registered domains that contain his name, is that ok? Or am I just a parasite on a leech? And if I am, is that good or bad? I mean, if a leech is bad, then a parasite on that leech must be good, right?

]]>