I’ve found in life that just about anything the government has a hand in, is bound to get screwed up. I’ve seen people freaking out that the unemployment rate has gone up to 5.7%. Yet when Bill Clinton was president 5.5% was considered full employment and in June it was at 5.5%. 
I guess the big question is what changed, what caused the jump?
One thing that changed was an increase in minimum wage. Minimum wage went up 70 cents.
When the government steps in and decides how we should run our businesses, we as business owners have to make changes to adjust to their stupid laws.
If I was an employee I’d much rather become an asset to my employer and get paid on my own merits rather than the government forcing my boss to pay me more. Of course the above problems belong to the US and I have to say that I love the US government. They help in alimenting my competition by passing law after law that hinder the ability of website owners to compete in an open market. Of course the funny part is the number of American people that want to pass even more laws that would hinder American business even more.
For example, a couple years ago a group of web designers wanted the government to step in and regulate the web design business. Set up a minimum requirement that a web design business must meet in order to sell websites. While they think this would be a way to eliminate competition, I saw it as a way to eliminate them. Had the government done that, the business owner would have to increase his cost to pay for the school and other regulations that the government would have imposed. Since I’m not in the US I would have not been affected and my prices would have stayed the same. Making it much easier to take their customers from them and increase my monthly income.
Now, don’t get me wrong, I’ve got stupid laws here in Colombia I have to work around. And those laws, that were made to help the employee, have a direct negative impact on almost every employee I hire.
Let me explain.
Here in Colombia, the government in all their wisdom passed a law that said any employee that works for you for more than 3 months gets a tone of benefits along with bunches of money if they decide to quit or I decide to fire them. My past employees took total advantage of this law, some even quitting once the money built up. Then my accountant told me that the government fires everyone they hire, every three months and hire back the employees from the previous three months.
Now I do the same.
The people that got hurt where the people the law was made to protect. Had the government stayed out of it, my employees and many others would have a steady income year round but with the exception of a few that is not the case.
The reason for the rise in unemployment is because the government decided to step in and help out those people, whom on their own are unable to make more than the minimum wage. If these employees deiced to become an asset instead of a minimum wage earner, they’d have nothing to worry about. And if the government stopped trying to help them, they’d still have a job.
Share This
4 Responses
Godhammer
August 5th, 2008 at 2:49 pm
1The government (USA) is also stepping in to “help” the more irresponsible among the borrowers and lenders that combined to create a housing bubble, refinancing boom, and subsequent crisis. Which probably has more to do with that 0.2% than the minimum wage. Though the entire concept of a minimum wage is also stupid.
Janeth
August 5th, 2008 at 7:50 pm
2Had it been a normal business that made those mistakes they would have been on their own.
Godhammer
August 6th, 2008 at 7:25 am
3Actually, “we” have a solid tradition in the grand old land of the free to do this with most failing and loud businesses. Consider dairy or corn farmers, both of which languish and sob and cry about the subsidies and tariffs that keep out more affordable sugar, rice, or in a more roundabout way, ethanol from Brazil as one option, which is a reason corn is through the roof, which is why livestock is high - but don’t buy beef from Argentina! and so on it goes. It’s everywhere, in nearly every business (uh, if oil hits $400 a barrel, to take a random thread from WPW, why the hell would wind and solar need massive subsidies). Eventually, the “no reward for risk or work, because all failure is diffuse and shared” model can easily lead to failed welfare economies and even governments. We’ll ask Mr. Chavez in a few years how his plans worked out.
Janeth
August 6th, 2008 at 4:16 pm
4Mr. Chavez’s plan is falling apart. I’ve for friends that live there and he has made quite the mess.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
Categories
Archives
Links
Meta
Calendar
|